Gigabyte GA-Z370 HD3-OP-CF

Performance Results

Gaming 109%
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 102%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 HD3-OP
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 HD3-OP-CF  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211113
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 27 '22 at 09:47
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 87.2
1-Core 128
2-Core 247
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 803
76% 628 Pts
64-Core 1,015
63% 1,015 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 884F) ≥ 4GB; Asus RTX 3060-Ti
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 171
Parallax 164
143% 170 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 136
Splatting 120
117% 147 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 127%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GMTE110S 256GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1102A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 525 665 577 427 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,401
Write 767
Mixed 491
SusWrite 465
172% 781 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 16
121% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 723
DQ Write 441
DQ Mixed 444
368% 536 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 145%
Great: 191%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$41
113GB free
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 129 148 145 143 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 434
Write 339
Mixed 296
SusWrite 175
69% 311 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 19.3
73% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 90.4
DQ Mixed 43.2
49% 83.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
61GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 148 159 152 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 166
Mixed 105
SusWrite 140
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
847GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 171 172 168 162 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 160
Mixed 96.2
SusWrite 168
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x16GB-$63
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 20.3
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 20.9
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 HD3-OP-CF Builds (Compare 414 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 109%
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 HD3-OP-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $719
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback