Lenovo 90NUZ58DUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 140%
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 124%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 90NUZ58DUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3704
Memory54.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '23 at 00:20
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 81.8
1-Core 139
2-Core 279
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 746
83% 652 Pts
64-Core 1,010
62% 1,010 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 92%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Lighting 235
Reflection 222
Parallax 213
192% 224 fps
MRender 202
Gravity 162
Splatting 142
135% 169 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 158%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G-1001 256GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20240001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 920
Write 1,050
Mixed 816
208% 929 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 52.2
183% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 829
DQ Write 948
DQ Mixed 718
588% 832 MB/s
Poor: 86% Great: 177%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
133GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,455
Write 6,459
Mixed 6,790
1,539% 6,901 MB/s
4K Read 592
4K Write 271
4K Mixed 316
1,445% 393 MB/s
DQ Read 1847
DQ Write 1,175
DQ Mixed 1,280
1,016% 1,434 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
507GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 150 151 149 149 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 149
Mixed 82
SusWrite 148
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2E3200C16 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.9% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 22.3
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 21.8
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90NUZ58DUS Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 73%
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

System: Lenovo 90NUZ58DUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback