MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics79.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '22 at 23:04
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 81.3
1-Core 180
2-Core 360
109% 207 Pts
4-Core 705
8-Core 1,317
121% 1,011 Pts
64-Core 2,324
144% 2,324 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Asus(1043 85DC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.9% Very good
Lighting 98.4
Reflection 111
Parallax 100
80% 103 fps
MRender 94.1
Gravity 97.6
Splatting 98.5
80% 96.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73
448GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 101 95 101 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1511
Write 561
Mixed 187
SusWrite 99.3
127% 590 MB/s
4K Read 62.2
4K Write 70.8
4K Mixed 59.3
208% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 675
DQ Write 76.8
DQ Mixed 124
155% 292 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 147%
Great: 295%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
9GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 507
Write 488
Mixed 333
98% 443 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 54.9
196% 69.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 176
186% 307 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
1GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 510
Write 498
Mixed 409
105% 472 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 65.2
220% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 372
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 136 124 127 119 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 135
Write 133
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 126
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 105%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
259GB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 185 181 177 178 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 144
Write 166
Mixed 99.6
SusWrite 181
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.9
499% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 94%
Great: 94%
WD Game Drive 5TB
215GB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 74 74 73 73 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 70.8
Write 76.9
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 73.5
96% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 71.9
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 33.2
131% 45.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 30.7
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 119%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $843
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback