Asus CP6230

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus CP6230  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CP6230
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120223
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 24 '23 at 17:19
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 88.1
2-Core 174
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 283
37% 279 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 1D01) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 17.6
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 18.1
14% 17.8 fps
MRender 15.6
Gravity 18.3
Splatting 16.3
14% 16.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu F300 480GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 191 166 106 85 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 346
Write 317
Mixed 291
SusWrite 131
61% 271 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 26.8
102% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 38.5
DQ Write 99.5
DQ Mixed 57.3
47% 65.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 107%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
559GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 125 127 133 134 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 152
Write 144
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 128
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
202% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 86%
External USB3.0 256GB
65GB free, PID 0561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 135 138 149 151 150 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
153% Outstanding
Read 287
Write 259
Mixed 234
SusWrite 142
303% 231 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 24.7
4K Mixed 18.8
1,544% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 20
DQ Write 28.1
DQ Mixed 21
1,744% 23 MB/s
External USB3.0 1TB
862GB free, PID 0561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 135 138 149 151 151 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 314
Write 291
Mixed 284
SusWrite 142
340% 258 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 22.6
4K Mixed 12.1
1,240% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 18
DQ Write 27.8
DQ Mixed 14.3
1,499% 20 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 150%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
59.8% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 19.8
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 17.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.8" 1280 720 DELD0DA DELL P2419H
Typical CP6230 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CP6230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback