Asus CP6230

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus CP6230  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CP6230
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '23 at 02:43
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 170
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 278
35% 264 Pts
64-Core 291
18% 291 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 1D01) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 17.7
14% 17.5 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 18.2
Splatting 16
14% 16.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu F300 480GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 322
Write 279
Mixed 274
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 31.8
104% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 15.6
DQ Mixed 124
89% 121 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 107%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
486GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 132 129 128 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 137
Write 125
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 129
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 86%
ADATA SP 900 256GB
165GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 100 104 106 108 108 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 223
Write 204
Mixed 203
SusWrite 103
242% 183 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 24.3
4K Mixed 19.6
1,558% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 21.2
DQ Write 28.4
DQ Mixed 21.9
1,790% 23.8 MB/s
Poor: 135%
This bench: 133%
Great: 154%
Netac SS D 1TB
927GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 175 179 187 188 188 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
162% Outstanding
Read 305
Write 286
Mixed 277
SusWrite 179
349% 262 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 24.4
4K Mixed 12.9
1,335% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 21
DQ Write 28.1
DQ Mixed 14.4
1,523% 21.2 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 162%
Great: 178%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
58.1% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 19.5
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 17
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.8" 1536 864 DELD0DA DELL P2419H
Typical CP6230 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CP6230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback