Asus CP6230

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus CP6230  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CP6230
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120223
Uptime3 Days
Run DateOct 26 '22 at 15:04
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 39.5
2-Core 111
45% 73.2 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 281
37% 275 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 1D01) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 17.6
14% 17.4 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 18.1
Splatting 16.1
14% 16.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu F300 480GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 183 149 114 87 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 307
Write 295
Mixed 80.4
SusWrite 127
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 24.6
68% 17.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 107%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
467GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 125 120 120 127 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 133
Write 128
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 121
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 86%
External USB3.0 6TB
827GB free, PID 0561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 139 133 143 148 147 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.8% Above average
Read 150
Write 157
Mixed 84.4
SusWrite 137
177% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
125% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 79%
External USB3.0 6TB
1.5TB free, PID 0561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 139 133 143 147 147 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73% Very good
Read 190
Write 201
Mixed 118
SusWrite 138
215% 162 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.5
225% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 73%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
56.2% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 19.6
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 9.3
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CP6230 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CP6230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback