Asus CP6230

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus CP6230  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CP6230
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '22 at 06:01
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$95
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 163
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 319
41% 312 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 1D01) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 19.7
14% 18.4 fps
MRender 15.6
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 16.4
14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu F300 480GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 332
Write 304
Mixed 1.8
46% 213 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 27.2
4K Mixed 14.8
73% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 99.3
DQ Mixed 55.4
68% 123 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 107%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
463GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 140
Write 139
Mixed 86.4
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 86%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$7
11GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 30.2
Write 7.7
Mixed 12
17% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.9
183% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 35%
External USB3.0 6TB
820GB free, PID 0561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 136 136 140 143 143 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.4% Good
Read 157
Write 159
Mixed 99.1
SusWrite 138
185% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
129% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 79%
External USB3.0 6TB
1.5TB free, PID 0561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 136 136 140 143 143 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.8% Very good
Read 196
Write 203
Mixed 124
SusWrite 138
220% 165 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.7
253% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
59.6% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 19.9
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 16.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CP6230 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CP6230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback