Asus CP6230

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus CP6230  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CP6230
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120223
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 27 '22 at 08:43
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 73.7
1-Core 47.1
2-Core 131
50% 84 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 281
36% 273 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 1D01) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 17.8
14% 17.6 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 18.1
Splatting 15.9
14% 16.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu F300 480GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 182 153 108 79 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 294
Write 283
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 127
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 29.2
4K Mixed 26.2
83% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 98.1
DQ Mixed 128
103% 149 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 107%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
467GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 119 116 124 126 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 139
Write 124
Mixed 89.8
SusWrite 121
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 86%
External USB3.0 6TB
827GB free, PID 0561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 132 131 140 142 143 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.4% Above average
Read 148
Write 160
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 135
177% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
129% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 79%
External USB3.0 6TB
1.5TB free, PID 0561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 132 131 140 142 143 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.7% Very good
Read 187
Write 192
Mixed 116
SusWrite 135
209% 158 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.5
221% 3 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
58.7% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 19.6
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CP6230 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CP6230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback