Asus CP6230

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus CP6230  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CP6230
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120223
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateNov 02 '22 at 04:23
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$95
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 69.8
1-Core 46.6
2-Core 130
49% 82.2 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 280
36% 273 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 1D01) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 17.8
14% 17.5 fps
MRender 15.3
Gravity 18
Splatting 16
13% 16.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu F300 480GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 196 170 100 79 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 314
Write 274
Mixed 259
SusWrite 131
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 20.8
4K Mixed 13.2
60% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 97.8
DQ Mixed 29
56% 117 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 107%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
466GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 123 121 122 127 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 154
Write 129
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 122
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
54.4% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 19.4
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 14.7
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CP6230 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CP6230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback