Asus CP6230

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus CP6230  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CP6230
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120223
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 11 '23 at 08:33
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$95
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 73.4
2-Core 152
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 268
32% 248 Pts
64-Core 267
16% 267 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 1D01) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 17.6
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 19.8
14% 18.4 fps
MRender 15.5
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 16.5
14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu F300 480GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 349
Write 323
Mixed 278
70% 316 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 32.2
80% 20.7 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 107%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
501GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 130 127 135 133 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 141
Write 141
Mixed 89.1
SusWrite 130
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 86%
External USB3.0 256GB
167GB free, PID 0561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 140 138 147 149 149 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
148% Outstanding
Read 288
Write 255
Mixed 235
SusWrite 141
301% 230 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 23.4
4K Mixed 19.2
1,509% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 21
DQ Write 27.9
DQ Mixed 22.6
1,796% 23.8 MB/s
External USB3.0 1TB
908GB free, PID 0561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 140 139 147 149 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 315
Write 283
Mixed 277
SusWrite 141
334% 254 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 12.3
1,294% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 17.9
DQ Write 27.9
DQ Mixed 13.8
1,485% 19.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 154%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 20
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 17.5
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.8" 1280 720 DELD0DA DELL P2419H
Typical CP6230 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CP6230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback