Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive319% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 26 '23 at 03:23
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 91
1-Core 159
2-Core 316
102% 189 Pts
4-Core 622
8-Core 952
97% 787 Pts
64-Core 1,106
68% 1,106 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 200
Parallax 123
113% 154 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 145
Splatting 124
105% 129 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
234GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1114 868 874 855 852 848 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 2713
Write 2,506
Mixed 1,885
SusWrite 902
448% 2,001 MB/s
4K Read 68.8
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 95.8
326% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,346
DQ Write 1,094
DQ Mixed 1,169
889% 1,203 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 319%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
730GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1055 1070 1069 1072 1066 1057 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 1,412
Write 1,111
Mixed 1,146
SusWrite 1,065
266% 1,184 MB/s
4K Read 67.8
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 94.9
314% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,407
DQ Write 1,122
DQ Mixed 1,231
931% 1,253 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 276%
Great: 372%
HyperX Savage 120GB-$80
112GB free
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 341 341 320 327 341 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 348
Mixed 279
SusWrite 335
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 83.4
4K Mixed 36.8
136% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 65.9
129% 258 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 104%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
86GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 141 154 149 149 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 320
Write 207
Mixed 255
SusWrite 152
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 40.3
150% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 166
128% 172 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 190 189 192 190 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 163
Mixed 71
SusWrite 188
109% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX KF3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 36.4
96% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 30.3
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 38.9
89% 31 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $796
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback