Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive321% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '23 at 00:09
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Memory 89.5
1-Core 158
2-Core 302
100% 183 Pts
4-Core 559
8-Core 913
90% 736 Pts
64-Core 1,048
65% 1,048 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 202
Parallax 123
113% 154 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 145
Splatting 124
106% 129 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
254GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1112 870 871 871 864 846 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 2,737
Write 2,500
Mixed 1,920
SusWrite 906
450% 2,016 MB/s
4K Read 68.8
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 97.7
329% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,335
DQ Write 1098
DQ Mixed 1,178
892% 1,204 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 321%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
730GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1035 1065 1068 1069 1065 1055 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 1,407
Write 1,109
Mixed 1,133
SusWrite 1,059
264% 1,177 MB/s
4K Read 66.9
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 94.7
311% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,409
DQ Write 1,119
DQ Mixed 1,238
934% 1,255 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 274%
Great: 372%
HyperX Savage 120GB-$80
112GB free
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 342 342 341 342 342 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 348
Mixed 281
SusWrite 342
82% 369 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 36.6
136% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 65.5
128% 258 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 104%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
120GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 141 147 143 143 148 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 393
Write 210
Mixed 243
SusWrite 148
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 41.9
150% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 164
121% 157 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 78%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 192 187 189 192 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 155
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 189
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX KF3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 37.8
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 29.5
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 39
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $796
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback