Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive320% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMar 11 '23 at 22:20
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Memory 91.2
1-Core 159
2-Core 302
101% 184 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 915
90% 737 Pts
64-Core 1,048
65% 1,048 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 202
Parallax 134
113% 158 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 144
Splatting 125
106% 129 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
281GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1109 870 869 872 850 838 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
320% Outstanding
Read 2,720
Write 2,508
Mixed 1,935
SusWrite 901
451% 2,016 MB/s
4K Read 69
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 96.2
327% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,362
DQ Write 1,104
DQ Mixed 1,180
898% 1,215 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 320%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
730GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1061 1070 1070 1071 1063 1056 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 1,422
Write 1,114
Mixed 1,157
SusWrite 1,065
267% 1,189 MB/s
4K Read 68.4
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 94.3
315% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1406
DQ Write 1,125
DQ Mixed 1,243
937% 1,258 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 276%
Great: 372%
HyperX Savage 120GB-$80
112GB free
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 341 341 341 342 341 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 347
Mixed 282
SusWrite 331
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 36.8
136% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 65.8
126% 253 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 104%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
120GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 153 147 143 148 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 337
Write 199
Mixed 235
SusWrite 150
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 41.9
147% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 170
125% 161 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 185 187 186 187 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 99.3
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 184
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
118% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 100%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX KF3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
97% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37.7
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 31.2
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 39.3
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $796
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback