Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive317% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 10 '23 at 22:35
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Memory 91.2
1-Core 151
2-Core 303
99% 182 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 907
90% 732 Pts
64-Core 1,000
62% 1,000 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 200
Parallax 122
113% 154 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 145
Splatting 123
105% 129 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1105 873 855 858 841 835 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
317% Outstanding
Read 2,680
Write 2,433
Mixed 1,897
SusWrite 894
442% 1,976 MB/s
4K Read 68.3
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 95.1
324% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,343
DQ Write 1,098
DQ Mixed 1,178
894% 1,206 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 317%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
730GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1043 1070 1070 1071 1065 1058 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 1,416
Write 1,110
Mixed 1,150
SusWrite 1,063
266% 1,185 MB/s
4K Read 68.2
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 93.8
313% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,408
DQ Write 1,120
DQ Mixed 1,238
933% 1,255 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 275%
Great: 372%
HyperX Savage 120GB-$80
111GB free
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 340 341 341 341 339 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 349
Mixed 276
SusWrite 340
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 36.7
136% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 65.9
127% 255 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 104%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
107GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 152 154 148 154 145 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 392
Write 208
Mixed 240
SusWrite 153
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 41.8
152% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 167
126% 166 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 186 186 185 187 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 164
Mixed 76
SusWrite 184
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 104%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX KF3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 38
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 30.8
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 38.1
89% 31 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $796
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback