Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive318% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 10 '23 at 23:58
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 155
2-Core 298
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 862
90% 724 Pts
64-Core 987
61% 987 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 199
Parallax 122
112% 153 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 136
Splatting 123
102% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1113 872 874 863 851 846 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
318% Outstanding
Read 2,681
Write 2,498
Mixed 1,880
SusWrite 903
445% 1,991 MB/s
4K Read 68.6
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 96
326% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,358
DQ Write 1,105
DQ Mixed 1,183
899% 1,215 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 318%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
730GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1051 1071 1072 1073 1056 1047 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 1,419
Write 1,108
Mixed 1,153
SusWrite 1,061
266% 1,185 MB/s
4K Read 68.1
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 94
313% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,406
DQ Write 1,126
DQ Mixed 1,246
938% 1,259 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 275%
Great: 372%
HyperX Savage 120GB-$80
111GB free
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 341 341 341 341 341 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 348
Mixed 280
SusWrite 341
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 36.7
136% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 65.8
128% 257 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 104%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
107GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 154 156 144 153 154 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 330
Write 183
Mixed 250
SusWrite 152
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 41.2
152% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 166
124% 164 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 186 188 184 188 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 153
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 184
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX KF3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 38.2
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 31.2
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 38.5
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $796
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback