Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive324% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 13 '22 at 00:46
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 90.5
1-Core 170
2-Core 320
105% 194 Pts
4-Core 624
8-Core 938
97% 781 Pts
64-Core 1,068
66% 1,068 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 139
Parallax 129
112% 135 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 135
Splatting 118
99% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1114 872 864 851 849 840 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 2720
Write 2,463
Mixed 1,929
SusWrite 898
448% 2,003 MB/s
4K Read 70.2
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 96.8
330% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1416
DQ Write 1,185
DQ Mixed 1246
948% 1,282 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 324%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
735GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1055 1065 1067 1066 1063 1060 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 1,409
Write 1,107
Mixed 1,142
SusWrite 1,063
265% 1,180 MB/s
4K Read 67.9
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 91.8
310% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,483
DQ Write 1,164
DQ Mixed 1,321
989% 1,323 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 276%
Great: 372%
HyperX Savage 120GB-$80
112GB free
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 341 341 341 342 341 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 350
Mixed 279
SusWrite 341
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 34.8
126% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 66.2
129% 258 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 104%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
108GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 156 139 155 152 158 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 385
Write 215
Mixed 233
SusWrite 155
55% 247 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 39
147% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 108
101% 155 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 190 188 187 188 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 170
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 186
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 108%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX KF3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 38
98% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 31.1
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 39.2
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $796
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback