Asus ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 165%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 182%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 130%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '22 at 06:21
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600K-$260
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 228
2-Core 446
133% 256 Pts
4-Core 892
8-Core 1,584
149% 1238 Pts
64-Core 2,655
164% 2,655 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 130%
Great: 128%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 360C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 186
Parallax 178
142% 180 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 183
Splatting 125
119% 147 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
252GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 441 457 464 464 463 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 440
Mixed 430
SusWrite 423
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 56.1
194% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 286
232% 328 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 121%
Great: 123%
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
13GB free
Firmware: SBFA12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 145 102 100 98 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 440
Write 216
Mixed 317
SusWrite 133
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 36.1
142% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 188
168% 252 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 90%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
35GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,458
Write 2,344
Mixed 1,642
478% 2,148 MB/s
4K Read 68.2
4K Write 224
4K Mixed 96.3
345% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 1,869
DQ Write 1861
DQ Mixed 1,864
1,401% 1,865 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
798GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 191 190 191 196 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 161
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 186
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 109%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 172 169 152 164 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 93.6
Mixed 104
SusWrite 158
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-7200J3445G162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 7400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
246% Outstanding
MC Read 101
MC Write 100
MC Mixed 93.1
280% 98 GB/s
SC Read 28.5
SC Write 56.5
SC Mixed 44.6
123% 43.2 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 137%
This bench: 246%
Great: 251%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 2,202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 453%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 596%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $2,371
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback