Performance Results

Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 35% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemCasper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK  (all builds)
MotherboardCasper Casper Nirvana Notebook
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '22 at 00:15
Run Duration351 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 33%
CPU Throttled 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Memory 66.6
1-Core 22.9
2-Core 42.3
32% 43.9 Pts
4-Core 67.4
8-Core 69
9% 68.2 Pts
64-Core 66.3
4% 66.3 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 999C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 6
Parallax 6.6
3% 5.4 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 45 22 67 15 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 437
Write 342
Mixed 98
SusWrite 62.2
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 17.9
4K Mixed 3.3
15% 7.3 MB/s
DQ Read 67
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 167
103% 112 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
439GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 103 103 102 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 88.7
Write 97.7
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 103
63% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64C8HG0NS-CG 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
30.3% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 12.7
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 8
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA NOTEBOOK Builds (Compare 2,361 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop 47%
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk


Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback