Asus ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 124%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 131%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '22 at 12:57
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600K-$260
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 236
2-Core 462
137% 263 Pts
4-Core 908
8-Core 1,486
146% 1,197 Pts
64-Core 2,631
163% 2,631 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 131%
Great: 128%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 360C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 185
Parallax 178
141% 178 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 183
Splatting 125
118% 147 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 433 443 462 396 403 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 352
Write 367
Mixed 319
SusWrite 410
82% 362 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 38.8
144% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 289
234% 331 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 123%
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
13GB free
Firmware: SBFA12.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 378
Write 313
Mixed 254
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 26.8
111% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 202
183% 278 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 90%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
60GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,692
Write 1,774
Mixed 1210
348% 1,559 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 211
4K Mixed 92.2
290% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,863
DQ Write 1,848
DQ Mixed 1,865
1,399% 1,859 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
903GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 193 192 192 196 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 167
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 192
109% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 101%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 168 177 176 170 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 133
Mixed 102
SusWrite 172
107% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
227% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-7200J3445G162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 7200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
233% Outstanding
MC Read 94
MC Write 95.5
MC Mixed 87.3
264% 92.3 GB/s
SC Read 31.7
SC Write 56.6
SC Mixed 40
122% 42.8 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 137%
This bench: 233%
Great: 251%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 2,203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 453%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 596%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $2,371
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback