Asus ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 167%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 124%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 134%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '22 at 12:29
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600K-$260
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 231
2-Core 463
136% 263 Pts
4-Core 925
8-Core 1,541
150% 1,233 Pts
64-Core 2,664
165% 2,664 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 134%
Great: 128%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 360C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 184
Parallax 176
142% 178 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 180
Splatting 123
117% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 431 446 465 390 406 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 382
Write 345
Mixed 338
SusWrite 398
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 45.3
163% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 287
232% 329 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 106%
Great: 123%
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
13GB free
Firmware: SBFA12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 128 100 100 43 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 317
Write 104
Mixed 156
SusWrite 117
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 26.9
105% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 192
166% 244 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 90%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
60GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,228
Write 2,294
Mixed 1,459
444% 1,994 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 93.2
307% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,872
DQ Write 1868
DQ Mixed 1,868
1,404% 1,870 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
903GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 185 189 193 193 191 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 128
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 184
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 100%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 140 131 150 174 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 72.4
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 143
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
207% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-7200J3445G162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 7200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
239% Outstanding
MC Read 96.8
MC Write 98
MC Mixed 89.1
270% 94.6 GB/s
SC Read 31.5
SC Write 55.7
SC Mixed 43.4
124% 43.5 GB/s
Latency 59.6
67% 59.6 ns
Poor: 137%
This bench: 239%
Great: 251%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 2,204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 453%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 596%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $2,371
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback