Asus ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 151%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 163%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 126%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '22 at 17:25
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600K-$260
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Memory 91.3
1-Core 212
2-Core 360
119% 221 Pts
4-Core 856
8-Core 1463
141% 1,159 Pts
64-Core 2,493
154% 2,493 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 126%
Great: 128%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 360C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 185
Parallax 173
131% 173 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 178
Splatting 117
114% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
255GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 400 410 458 391 379 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 419
Mixed 437
SusWrite 395
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 53.3
180% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 217
199% 307 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 115%
Great: 123%
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
13GB free
Firmware: SBFA12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 97 95 114 102 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 456
Write 176
Mixed 335
SusWrite 119
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 29.2
127% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 193
172% 256 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 90%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
60GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,012
Write 1,806
Mixed 1,448
390% 1,755 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 84.6
294% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,860
DQ Write 1,759
DQ Mixed 1,860
1,383% 1,827 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
903GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 183 187 194 194 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 94.3
Mixed 83.1
SusWrite 189
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 168 175 176 176 165 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 163
Mixed 106
SusWrite 170
116% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-7200J3445G162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 7200 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
218% Outstanding
MC Read 93.5
MC Write 84.8
MC Mixed 81.5
247% 86.6 GB/s
SC Read 27.9
SC Write 52.3
SC Mixed 36.5
111% 38.9 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 137%
This bench: 218%
Great: 251%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 2,203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 453%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 596%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $2,371
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback