Asus ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 168%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 126%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '22 at 17:59
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600K-$260
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
126% Outstanding
Memory 91.5
1-Core 213
2-Core 428
127% 244 Pts
4-Core 858
8-Core 1,520
143% 1,189 Pts
64-Core 2,545
158% 2,545 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 126%
Great: 128%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 360C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (165 fps cap detected)
122% Outstanding
Lighting 165
Reflection 165
Parallax 165
134% 165 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 165
Splatting 125
114% 141 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 122%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 417 388 465 376 403 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 469
Mixed 447
SusWrite 404
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 53.5
178% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 288
233% 330 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 116%
Great: 123%
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
13GB free
Firmware: SBFA12.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 463
Write 368
Mixed 342
87% 391 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 34.7
137% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 194
174% 262 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 90%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
60GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,538
Write 2,365
Mixed 1,747
493% 2,216 MB/s
4K Read 70.1
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 92
329% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,871
DQ Write 1,764
DQ Mixed 1,854
1,382% 1,829 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
905GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 190 191 189 190 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 123
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 191
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 111%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 173 176 175 171 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 217
Write 138
Mixed 120
SusWrite 174
119% 162 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 112%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-7200J3445G162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 7200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
223% Outstanding
MC Read 96.9
MC Write 86.4
MC Mixed 83
254% 88.8 GB/s
SC Read 28.5
SC Write 53.3
SC Mixed 36.6
113% 39.5 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 137%
This bench: 223%
Great: 251%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 2,204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 453%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 596%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $2,371
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback