Asus PRIME B365M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive367% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B365M-A  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '22 at 02:38
Run Duration321 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$166
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 189
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 560
58% 469 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4839
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.19% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 7.4
6% 7.8 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 11
7% 8.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.19%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
490GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1655 1459 1458 1479 1468 1455 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
367% Outstanding
Read 2,689
Write 2,470
Mixed 1,688
SusWrite 1,496
467% 2,086 MB/s
4K Read 73.1
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 105
345% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,597
DQ Write 1,130
DQ Mixed 1,339
1,007% 1,355 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 367%
Great: 372%
WDC WD120EDAZ-11F3RA 12TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 81.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 123 121 124 124 121 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 115
Write 122
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 123
25% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 1
8% 3.9 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 6.8
DQ Mixed 1.6
2% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 22%
Samsung SSD 1TB
401GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 491 491 488 491 490 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 456
Mixed 393
SusWrite 490
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 65.7
220% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 268
212% 294 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 132%
Great: 139%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
321GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1732 1303 1296 1300 1310 1349 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
364% Outstanding
Read 2,665
Write 2,390
Mixed 1,630
SusWrite 1,382
451% 2,017 MB/s
4K Read 74.9
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 107
353% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1,646
DQ Write 1,202
DQ Mixed 1,376
1,041% 1,408 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 364%
Great: 372%
Toshiba HDWD260 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: KQ00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 146 147 146 148 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 97.8
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 148
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 0.7
282% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 105%
WD WD500VF4PZ-48RZSM0 5TB
491GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 104 106 102 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
52% Above average
Read 77
Write 74.5
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 104
59% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK16GX4M1A2400C14 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
75.7% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 24.9
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 21.8
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B365M-A Builds (Compare 5,368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B365M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $383
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback