HP All-in-One 22-c0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP All-in-One 22-c0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8446
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220622
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 02 '23 at 18:06
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 191
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 440
54% 410 Pts
64-Core 536
33% 536 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 8446) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
3.47% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 7
Parallax 5.6
2% 5.07 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 9.3
6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.47%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
765GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 142 139 156 160 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 170
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 145
93% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
34% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 10.2
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 10.9
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 92.1
43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical All-in-One 22-c0xx Builds (Compare 454 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP All-in-One 22-c0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $315WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback