Asus PRIME B365M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive417% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B365M-A  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '22 at 19:46
Run Duration319 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$139
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 88.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 248
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 706
72% 583 Pts
64-Core 736
46% 736 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4839
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.17% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 7.7
6% 7.93 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 11.2
7% 8.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.17%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$142
437GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2259 2243 1256 1408 1391 1404 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
417% Outstanding
Read 2,730
Write 2312
Mixed 1,514
SusWrite 1,660
460% 2,054 MB/s
4K Read 78.6
4K Write 248
4K Mixed 115
398% 147 MB/s
DQ Read 2,159
DQ Write 1,587
DQ Mixed 1776
1,354% 1,841 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 417%
Great: 372%
WDC WD120EDAZ-11F3RA 12TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 81.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 134 138 137 136 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 181
Write 191
Mixed 100
SusWrite 136
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 0.9
9% 4.17 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 8
DQ Mixed 1.5
2% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 22%
Samsung SSD 1TB
468GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 492 493 493 493 493 492 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 447
Mixed 407
SusWrite 493
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 69.5
237% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 243
195% 274 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 136%
Great: 139%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$142
394GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2513 1669 1617 1616 1617 1622 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
431% Outstanding
Read 2,732
Write 2,547
Mixed 1,478
SusWrite 1,776
478% 2133 MB/s
4K Read 78.9
4K Write 266
4K Mixed 118
411% 154 MB/s
DQ Read 2,200
DQ Write 1,695
DQ Mixed 1,856
1,413% 1,917 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 431%
Great: 372%
Toshiba HDWD260 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: KQ00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 152 153 152 153 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 182
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 152
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 0.6
274% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 105%
WD WD500VF4PZ-48RZSM0 5TB
673GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 88 87 87 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 104
Write 103
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 87.3
67% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK16GX4M1A2400C14 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.3% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 12.5
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13.5
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B365M-A Builds (Compare 5,393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B365M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $383
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback