Asus PRIME B365M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B365M-A  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '21 at 10:12
Run Duration325 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$139
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 91.7
1-Core 127
2-Core 254
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 748
78% 628 Pts
64-Core 748
46% 748 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 93%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4839
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
6.45% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 7.8
6% 8.2 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 11.5
8% 9.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.45%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SSD 1TB
571GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 491 479 495 496 495 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 458
Mixed 426
SusWrite 490
106% 468 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 66.7
228% 83.3 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 255
201% 278 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 134%
Great: 139%
WDC WD120EDAZ-11F3RA 12TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 81.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 155 155 161 159 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 155
Write 165
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 158
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 1
8% 3.83 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 7.9
DQ Mixed 1.7
2% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 22%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$142
469GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2578 2194 1436 1418 1419 1438 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
427% Outstanding
Read 2,747
Write 2582
Mixed 1,924
SusWrite 1747
505% 2,250 MB/s
4K Read 78.9
4K Write 257
4K Mixed 117
406% 151 MB/s
DQ Read 2,256
DQ Write 1,552
DQ Mixed 1,767
1,356% 1,858 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 427%
Great: 372%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$142
360GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2587 2209 1472 1456 1457 1472 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
430% Outstanding
Read 2,760
Write 2,412
Mixed 1,990
SusWrite 1,776
501% 2,234 MB/s
4K Read 78.9
4K Write 267
4K Mixed 119
413% 155 MB/s
DQ Read 2,169
DQ Write 1,595
DQ Mixed 1,811
1,373% 1,858 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 430%
Great: 372%
WD WD500VF4PZ-48RZSM0 5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 86 87 87 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 103
Write 101
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 86.7
67% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 86%
Toshiba HDWD260 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: KQ00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 153 152 156 154 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 95.5
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 154
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 0.6
272% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK16GX4M1A2400C14 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.3% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 13.9
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 16.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B365M-A Builds (Compare 5,392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B365M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $383
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback