Asus PRIME B365M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics5.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive376% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B365M-A  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '22 at 20:00
Run Duration321 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$165
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 246
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 734
76% 613 Pts
64-Core 728
45% 728 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4839
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.52% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 6.5
5% 6.53 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 9.9
6% 7.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.52%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
437GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1816 1939 1335 1382 1368 1383 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
376% Outstanding
Read 2453
Write 2,179
Mixed 1,647
SusWrite 1,537
438% 1,954 MB/s
4K Read 73
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 105
358% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 1,886
DQ Write 1418
DQ Mixed 1,543
1,183% 1,616 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 376%
Great: 372%
WDC WD120EDAZ-11F3RA 12TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 81.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 134 138 137 136 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 182
Write 187
Mixed 97.8
SusWrite 136
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 1.1
8% 3.77 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 8.5
DQ Mixed 1.4
2% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 22%
Samsung SSD 1TB
468GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 463 464 457 465 470 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 451
Mixed 389
SusWrite 464
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 63.7
216% 77.6 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 269
205% 276 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 127%
Great: 139%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
394GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2190 1734 1614 1612 1609 1600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
398% Outstanding
Read 2,510
Write 1,989
Mixed 1,584
SusWrite 1,727
437% 1,952 MB/s
4K Read 72.9
4K Write 234
4K Mixed 106
371% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 1,976
DQ Write 1,502
DQ Mixed 1,637
1,252% 1,705 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 398%
Great: 372%
Toshiba HDWD260 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: KQ00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 150 153 150 153 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 158
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 152
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 0.6
274% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 94%
Great: 105%
WD WD500VF4PZ-48RZSM0 5TB
673GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 82 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
52% Above average
Read 98
Write 99.5
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 83
64% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK16GX4M1A2400C14 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.7% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 12.4
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 14.7
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B365M-A Builds (Compare 5,368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B365M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $383
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback