Asus PRIME B365M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive401% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B365M-A  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '21 at 22:47
Run Duration329 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Memory 92.8
1-Core 127
2-Core 255
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 751
78% 630 Pts
64-Core 759
47% 759 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4839
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.51% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 7.8
6% 8.23 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 11.5
8% 9.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.51%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
467GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2509 2024 1393 1366 1338 1350 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
401% Outstanding
Read 2,645
Write 2,562
Mixed 1,865
SusWrite 1,664
490% 2,184 MB/s
4K Read 76.4
4K Write 236
4K Mixed 115
388% 142 MB/s
DQ Read 1,903
DQ Write 1,382
DQ Mixed 1,548
1,182% 1611 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 401%
Great: 372%
WDC WD120EDAZ-11F3RA 12TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 81.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 163 160 161 161 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 152
Write 161
Mixed 96.3
SusWrite 161
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 0.9
9% 4.13 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 6.9
DQ Mixed 1.4
2% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 22%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
647GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2580 2217 1516 1521 1530 1533 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
428% Outstanding
Read 2,762
Write 2,449
Mixed 1,967
SusWrite 1,816
504% 2,248 MB/s
4K Read 78.8
4K Write 261
4K Mixed 117
407% 152 MB/s
DQ Read 2,096
DQ Write 1,552
DQ Mixed 1,618
1,265% 1,755 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 428%
Great: 372%
Samsung SSD 1TB
493GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 497 497 497 497 497 455 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 467
Mixed 425
SusWrite 490
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 67.4
229% 82.1 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 255
195% 264 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 132%
Great: 139%
Toshiba HDWD260 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: KQ00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 152 151 154 155 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 181
Mixed 70
SusWrite 151
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 0.7
285% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 96%
Great: 105%
WD WD500VF4PZ-48RZSM0 5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 127 124 124 120 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 154
Write 128
Mixed 90.8
SusWrite 124
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK16GX4M1A2400C14 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.6% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 13.4
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.7
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B365M-A Builds (Compare 5,368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B365M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $383
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback