Asus PRIME B365M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive377% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B365M-A  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '22 at 13:55
Run Duration322 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$139
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 94.6
2-Core 189
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 565
59% 471 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4839
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.13% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 7.5
6% 7.7 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 11.1
7% 8.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.13%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$142
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1707 1596 1504 1558 1570 1414 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
377% Outstanding
Read 2,682
Write 2,504
Mixed 1,600
SusWrite 1,558
467% 2,086 MB/s
4K Read 74.9
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 106
352% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1,705
DQ Write 1,217
DQ Mixed 1,438
1,080% 1,453 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 377%
Great: 372%
WDC WD120EDAZ-11F3RA 12TB
4TB free
Firmware: 81.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 124 126 128 125 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 144
Write 153
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 126
29% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 1
8% 3.87 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 8
DQ Mixed 1.7
2% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 22%
Samsung SSD 1TB
468GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 490 483 491 491 491 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 454
Mixed 416
SusWrite 490
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 66.6
224% 79.7 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 265
207% 285 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 133%
Great: 139%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$142
372GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1967 1620 1620 1617 1618 1619 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
381% Outstanding
Read 2,666
Write 2,519
Mixed 1,632
SusWrite 1,677
476% 2,124 MB/s
4K Read 75.3
4K Write 231
4K Mixed 110
377% 139 MB/s
DQ Read 1,742
DQ Write 736
DQ Mixed 1,028
817% 1,169 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 381%
Great: 372%
Toshiba HDWD260 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: KQ00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 150 153 151 153 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 86.3
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 150
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 0.6
266% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 105%
WD WD500VF4PZ-48RZSM0 5TB
530GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 94 95 94 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 110
Write 102
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 93.7
69% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK16GX4M1A2400C14 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
47.9% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 14
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 16.1
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B365M-A Builds (Compare 5,392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B365M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $383
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback