TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-P55WV7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 23 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55WV7  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 30 '22 at 12:15
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 90
2-Core 171
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 506
49% 402 Pts
64-Core 543
34% 543 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 67.5%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Gigabyte(1458 D555) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1215
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.9% Average
Lighting 55.7
Reflection 68
Parallax 58.7
45% 60.8 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 56.8
Splatting 59.9
50% 61 fps
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 46.9%
 Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk Ultra 3D NVMe 1TB
380GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1219 803 668 590 577 465 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1,532
Write 1,632
Mixed 1,243
SusWrite 720
288% 1,282 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 60.6
207% 74.2 MB/s
DQ Read 877
DQ Write 514
DQ Mixed 701
520% 697 MB/s
Poor: 161% ↑
This bench: 200%
 Great: 280%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$70
114GB free
Firmware: X61110RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 383 354 369 423 424 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 443
Mixed 374
SusWrite 382
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 42.5
147% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 286
233% 332 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑
This bench: 104%
 Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.M8FB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
70.1% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 21.6
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 18.8
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 70.1%
 Great: 79%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-P55WV7 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55WV7

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples24x
GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples14x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples10x
SSD
Ultra 3D NVMe 1TBSandiskBench 232%, 13,576 samples7x
MTS800 M.2 256GBTranscend  $141Bench 79%, 1,971 samples5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples2x
RAM
CBD24D4S7D8MB-16 1x16GBKingstonBench 42%, 1,209 samples11x
CT8G4SFS824A.M8FB 2x8GBCrucialBench 71%, 297 samples6x
F4 DDR4 2133 C15 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 72%, 1,022 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback