ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-P55WV7

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 23 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P55WV7 (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180226
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 18 '22 at 14:18
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 105 2-Core 202 75% 131 Pts	4-Core 363 8-Core 576 58% 469 Pts	64-Core 565 35% 565 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Gigabyte(1458 D555) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1165 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Lighting 59 Reflection 72.2 Parallax 61.7 48% 64.3 fps	MRender 69 Gravity 60 Splatting 62.7 52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk Ultra 3D NVMe 1TB 13,576 User benchmarks, average bench 232% 465GB free (System drive) Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1416 812 824 757 654 646 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	218% Outstanding	Read 1,552 Write 1,638 Mixed 1,377 SusWrite 852 305% 1,355 MB/s	4K Read 47.3 4K Write 134 4K Mixed 64.7 225% 82 MB/s	DQ Read 922 DQ Write 609 DQ Mixed 776 576% 769 MB/s
Poor: 161% ↑ This bench: 218% Great: 280%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$70 13,482 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 113GB free Firmware: X61110RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 390 358 418 423 310 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 478 Write 433 Mixed 355 SusWrite 378 92% 411 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 80.1 4K Mixed 41.3 143% 51 MB/s	DQ Read 371 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 286 232% 328 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 119%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.M8FB 2x8GB 297 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	MC Read 29 MC Write 30.1 MC Mixed 21.9 77% 27 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 30.4 SC Mixed 23.9 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GA-P55WV7 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55WV7

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	24x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	14x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	10x

SSD
Ultra 3D NVMe 1TBSandiskBench 232%, 13,576 samples	7x
MTS800 M.2 256GBTranscend $140Bench 79%, 1,971 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
CBD24D4S7D8MB-16 1x16GBKingstonBench 42%, 1,209 samples	11x
CT8G4SFS824A.M8FB 2x8GBCrucialBench 71%, 297 samples	6x
F4 DDR4 2133 C15 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 72%, 1,022 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback