TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-P55WV7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 23 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55WV7  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 17 '22 at 19:20
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 206
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 575
59% 474 Pts
64-Core 574
36% 574 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 76.3%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Gigabyte(1458 D555) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1165
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.7% Average
Lighting 58
Reflection 70.8
Parallax 60.7
47% 63.2 fps
MRender 67.6
Gravity 59.2
Splatting 62.2
51% 63 fps
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 48.7%
 Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk Ultra 3D NVMe 1TB
466GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1411 812 800 726 673 664 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,540
Write 1,614
Mixed 1,315
SusWrite 848
299% 1,329 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 70.3
234% 83.7 MB/s
DQ Read 956
DQ Write 624
DQ Mixed 784
586% 788 MB/s
Poor: 161% ↑
This bench: 221%
 Great: 280%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$70
113GB free
Firmware: X61110RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 389 385 372 420 381 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 439
Mixed 379
SusWrite 385
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 43.3
144% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 285
231% 327 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑
This bench: 104%
 Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.M8FB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
75.4% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 22.4
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 21.5
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 75.4%
 Great: 79%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-P55WV7 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55WV7

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples24x
GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples14x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples10x
SSD
Ultra 3D NVMe 1TBSandiskBench 232%, 13,576 samples7x
MTS800 M.2 256GBTranscend  $140Bench 79%, 1,971 samples5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples2x
RAM
CBD24D4S7D8MB-16 1x16GBKingstonBench 42%, 1,209 samples11x
CT8G4SFS824A.M8FB 2x8GBCrucialBench 71%, 297 samples6x
F4 DDR4 2133 C15 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 72%, 1,022 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback