TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-P55WV7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 23 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55WV7  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '22 at 15:26
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 561
57% 460 Pts
64-Core 547
34% 547 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 69.6%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Gigabyte(1458 D555) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1165
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.4% Average
Lighting 57.9
Reflection 28.7
Parallax 49.8
47% 45.5 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 47.2
Splatting 19.6
33% 43.7 fps
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 42.4%
 Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk Ultra 3D NVMe 1TB
468GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1069 853 781 767 772 688 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,530
Write 1,718
Mixed 1,380
SusWrite 822
307% 1,363 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 63.8
222% 80 MB/s
DQ Read 910
DQ Write 601
DQ Mixed 780
575% 764 MB/s
Poor: 161% ↑
This bench: 214%
 Great: 280%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$70
113GB free
Firmware: X61110RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 345 342 348 366 419 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 429
Mixed 366
SusWrite 349
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 38.6
138% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 286
230% 325 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑
This bench: 98.9%
 Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.M8FB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
74.4% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 22.1
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 21.6
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 95.1
42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 74.4%
 Great: 79%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-P55WV7 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55WV7

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples24x
GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples14x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples10x
SSD
Ultra 3D NVMe 1TBSandiskBench 232%, 13,576 samples7x
MTS800 M.2 256GBTranscend  $141Bench 79%, 1,971 samples5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples2x
RAM
CBD24D4S7D8MB-16 1x16GBKingstonBench 42%, 1,209 samples11x
CT8G4SFS824A.M8FB 2x8GBCrucialBench 71%, 297 samples6x
F4 DDR4 2133 C15 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 72%, 1,022 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback