ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-P55WV7

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 23 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P55WV7 (all builds)
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180226
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '22 at 11:06
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Memory 85.4 1-Core 105 2-Core 189 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 363 8-Core 535 56% 449 Pts	64-Core 553 34% 553 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Gigabyte(1458 D555) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1165 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.4% Average	Lighting 58.9 Reflection 71.5 Parallax 61.4 48% 63.9 fps	MRender 68.2 Gravity 59.9 Splatting 63.2 52% 63.8 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk Ultra 3D NVMe 1TB 13,576 User benchmarks, average bench 232% 452GB free (System drive) Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1386 804 823 715 631 667 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	216% Outstanding	Read 1527 Write 1,639 Mixed 1,391 SusWrite 838 303% 1,349 MB/s	4K Read 47.8 4K Write 131 4K Mixed 67.2 228% 81.9 MB/s	DQ Read 902 DQ Write 571 DQ Mixed 772 566% 749 MB/s
Poor: 161% ↑ This bench: 216% Great: 280%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$70 13,482 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 112GB free Firmware: X61110RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 386 356 421 424 362 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 487 Write 446 Mixed 361 SusWrite 383 94% 419 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 77.8 4K Mixed 42.3 143% 50.4 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 283 230% 326 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 119%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.M8FB 2x8GB 297 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 29 MC Mixed 22 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 27.4 SC Mixed 22.2 63% 22.1 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GA-P55WV7 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55WV7

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	24x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	14x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	10x

SSD
Ultra 3D NVMe 1TBSandiskBench 232%, 13,576 samples	7x
MTS800 M.2 256GBTranscend $141Bench 79%, 1,971 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
CBD24D4S7D8MB-16 1x16GBKingstonBench 42%, 1,209 samples	11x
CT8G4SFS824A.M8FB 2x8GBCrucialBench 71%, 297 samples	6x
F4 DDR4 2133 C15 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 72%, 1,022 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback