TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-P55WV7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 23 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55WV7  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '22 at 13:03
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 88.7
2-Core 189
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 498
52% 416 Pts
64-Core 546
34% 546 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 71.7%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Gigabyte(1458 D555) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1165
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 11.7
Reflection 57.6
Parallax 58.8
10% 42.7 fps
MRender 59.6
Gravity 20.7
Splatting 49.7
36% 43.3 fps
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 18.5%
 Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk Ultra 3D NVMe 1TB
468GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 707 925 673 576 648 591 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,463
Write 1,727
Mixed 1,333
SusWrite 687
293% 1,303 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 99.1
4K Mixed 57.2
194% 67.1 MB/s
DQ Read 824
DQ Write 593
DQ Mixed 753
551% 723 MB/s
Poor: 161% ↑
This bench: 192%
 Great: 280%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$70
113GB free
Firmware: X61110RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 306 284 292 395 408 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 389
Mixed 363
SusWrite 318
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 39.3
136% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 282
230% 326 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑
This bench: 94.8%
 Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.M8FB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68% Good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 21.2
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 19.4
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 68%
 Great: 79%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-P55WV7 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55WV7

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples24x
GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples14x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples10x
SSD
Ultra 3D NVMe 1TBSandiskBench 232%, 13,576 samples7x
MTS800 M.2 256GBTranscend  $141Bench 79%, 1,971 samples5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples2x
RAM
CBD24D4S7D8MB-16 1x16GBKingstonBench 42%, 1,209 samples11x
CT8G4SFS824A.M8FB 2x8GBCrucialBench 71%, 297 samples6x
F4 DDR4 2133 C15 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 72%, 1,022 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback