Quanta NL9K

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Quanta NL9K (all builds)
Motherboard	Quanta NL9K/NL8K
Memory	2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161213
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '22 at 16:06
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	Memory 28.5 1-Core 88.4 2-Core 106 42% 74.3 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 489 44% 373 Pts	64-Core 483 30% 483 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Quanta(152D 1156) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2112 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	3.93% Terrible	Lighting 5.7 Reflection 67.4 Parallax 6.4 5% 26.5 fps	MRender 4.7 Gravity 5.7 Splatting 0.2 2% 3.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.93% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SM2280S3G2240G 240GB 3,414 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM01.W SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 197 276 206 186 275 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	51.7% Above average	Read 351 Write 287 Mixed 200 SusWrite 219 59% 264 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 27.8 4K Mixed 16.4 52% 18.4 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 147 118% 167 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 97%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$50 64,201 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 88GB free Firmware: SM36 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 78 73 76 85 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 68.4 Write 90.5 Mixed 61.9 SusWrite 79.3 55% 75 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C13 1x8GB 515 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	22% Poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 6.4 21% 7.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 10.6 SC Mixed 10 28% 9.73 GB/s	Latency 264 15% 264 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	61	41	60	17.2"	1920 1080	AUO109D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical NL9K Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Quanta NL9K

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	17x
Core i7-7820HKIntelBench 72%, 18,903 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	13x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	3x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	2x

SSD
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $119Bench 128%, 20,782 samples	3x
MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,038 samples	2x
CV3-8D256 256GBLiteonBench 75%, 4,538 samples	2x

RAM
16ATF2G64HZ-2G3E1 1x16GBMicronBench 42%, 648 samples	3x
SODIM DDR4 2133 C15 1x16GBCorsairBench 38%, 873 samples	2x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 66%, 14,350 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $119

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $310	Nvidia RTX 3060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12600K $225	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $300	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $86
Intel Core i5-12400F $150	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $780	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $67	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16