Quanta NL9K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQuanta NL9K  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta NL9K/NL8K
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161213
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateNov 23 '22 at 16:06
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Memory 28.5
1-Core 88.4
2-Core 106
42% 74.3 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 489
44% 373 Pts
64-Core 483
30% 483 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Quanta(152D 1156) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2112
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
3.93% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 67.4
Parallax 6.4
5% 26.5 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 0.2
2% 3.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.93%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SM2280S3G2240G 240GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.W
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 197 276 206 186 275 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 351
Write 287
Mixed 200
SusWrite 219
59% 264 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 27.8
4K Mixed 16.4
52% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 147
118% 167 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 97%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$41
88GB free
Firmware: SM36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 78 73 76 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 68.4
Write 90.5
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 79.3
55% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C13 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
22% Poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 6.4
21% 7.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 264
15% 264 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 22%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NL9K Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Quanta NL9K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $125
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback