Asus H110M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '20 at 06:03
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 57
1-Core 25.9
2-Core 77.8
34% 53.6 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 417
44% 354 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.88% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 7.5
5% 6.67 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 10.2
7% 8.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.88%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 275 283 280 272 273 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 434
Write 422
Mixed 357
SusWrite 288
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 29.3
99% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 268
210% 291 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
428GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 77 76 77 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 98.6
Write 96.7
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 75.9
61% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 68%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
1TB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 95 95 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 81.8
Write 67.3
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 94.4
99% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 52%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$7
29GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 21 20 14 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 37.4
Write 21
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 17.8
32% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 3.1
201% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
61.8% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 21.5
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 8.1
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-PLUS Builds (Compare 631 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $351
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback