Asus H110M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161227
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 22 '20 at 10:14
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
45.7% Average
Memory 56.5
1-Core 25.8
2-Core 51.6
30% 44.6 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 350
32% 269 Pts
64-Core 409
25% 409 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.87% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 7.4
5% 6.97 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 10.3
7% 8.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.87%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 278 284 284 279 274 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 440
Write 419
Mixed 381
SusWrite 295
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 28.9
99% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 350
244% 307 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
428GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 77 75 76 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 99.8
Write 98
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 75.4
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 68%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
1TB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 95 95 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 81.3
Write 67.2
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 94.4
99% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
142% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 52%
Patriot Memory 16GB
14GB free, PID 3800
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 18 19 19 18 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 17
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 18.7
24% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
56.4% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 21.7
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 8.1
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-PLUS Builds (Compare 634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $351
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback