Asus H110M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161227
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 22 '20 at 10:33
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 56.1
1-Core 25.8
2-Core 102
36% 61.5 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 416
48% 376 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.86% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 7.5
5% 7.13 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 10.2
7% 8.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.86%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 279 282 283 282 268 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 410
Write 386
Mixed 374
SusWrite 294
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 27.9
96% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 289
215% 287 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
428GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 77 76 76 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 95.2
Write 98
Mixed 62
SusWrite 76.1
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 68%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
1TB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 95 95 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 81
Write 67.4
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 94.4
99% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38%
Great: 52%
Patriot Memory 16GB
14GB free, PID 3800
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 17
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 15.8
23% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.9
81% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 14%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
24GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 16 16 16 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 20.9
Mixed 25
SusWrite 15.6
31% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 3
202% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
57.6% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 21.6
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-PLUS Builds (Compare 634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $351
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback