Asus H110M-K

Performance Results

Gaming 19%
Desktop 79%
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-K  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170922
Uptime4 Days
Run DateNov 20 '22 at 14:17
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 201
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 374
48% 363 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.10.3
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.2% Average
Lighting 62.7
Reflection 60.5
Parallax 81.3
51% 68.2 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 67
Splatting 44.7
46% 57.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 18 86 97 24 126 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.3% Poor
Read 166
Write 90.1
Mixed 102
SusWrite 74.8
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 17.9
4K Mixed 10
37% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 38.4
DQ Write 38
DQ Mixed 31
25% 35.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 85%
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$30
129GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 166 76 77 78 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 418
Write 300
Mixed 292
SusWrite 136
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 26.2
110% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 186
163% 242 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
262GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 85 87 86 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 85.8
Write 84.9
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 85.2
57% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 78.B1GQL.C7C0C 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
37% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 10.5
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 10.4
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 6,031 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 21%
Desktop 73%
Workstation 17%

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback