Today's hottest deals

MSI H61M-P23 (MS-7680)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7680
MotherboardMSI H61M-P23 (MS-7680)  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '22 at 19:18
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 183
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 354
47% 354 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 230
Sapphire(174B 1058) 1.5GB
Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.08% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 2.3
4% 4.87 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 2.9
3% 4.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.08%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 320GB-$59
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GM3OA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 62 59 65 55 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 78.6
Write 75.6
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 60.1
47% 64 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 46%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
1TB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 27 27 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 25.8
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 26.9
36% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8F Kingston ACR16D3LU1KBG/4G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.8% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 14.3
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-P23 (MS-7680) Builds (Compare 243 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H61M-P23 (MS-7680)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback