Performance Results

Gaming 29%
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 28%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive301% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '22 at 00:38
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 69.7
1-Core 144
2-Core 269
86% 161 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 858
83% 684 Pts
64-Core 1,103
68% 1,103 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Sapphire(174B 5454) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26% Poor
Lighting 32.7
Reflection 34.6
Parallax 32.9
27% 33.4 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 33.6
Splatting 23.5
25% 31.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
441GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A4SANA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1974 1375 592 549 515 555 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
301% Outstanding
Read 2,695
Write 2,070
Mixed 241
SusWrite 926
327% 1,483 MB/s
4K Read 62.4
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 86.4
301% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 729
DQ Write 1205
DQ Mixed 478
500% 804 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 301%
Great: 318%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
931GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 124 126 126 126 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 112
Write 102
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 124
72% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 68%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 40.2
Write 38.4
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 40.9
28% 37.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.6% Good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 26.9
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 26
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27.2" 1280 720 HWP3052 HP 27bw
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 129%
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 130%

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $972
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback