Asus H110M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161227
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 22 '20 at 10:05
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	LTU-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$60 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Memory 64.9 1-Core 24.9 2-Core 76.5 36% 55.4 Pts	4-Core 238 8-Core 401 39% 320 Pts	64-Core 419 26% 419 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) 188,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	4.71% Terrible	Lighting 6.4 Reflection 6.3 Parallax 7.5 5% 6.73 fps	MRender 8.8 Gravity 6.5 Splatting 0.3 4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.71% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 263 268 264 267 270 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Read 445 Write 418 Mixed 352 SusWrite 277 84% 373 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 35.9 4K Mixed 30.1 98% 30.9 MB/s	DQ Read 326 DQ Write 264 DQ Mixed 336 240% 309 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 428GB free Firmware: CC38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 75 75 75 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Read 100 Write 91.7 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 74.3 59% 79.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 172% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 68%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB 5,095 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1TB free, PID 61b5 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 95 95 95 95 95 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 80 Write 67.6 Mixed 51.9 SusWrite 94.3 99% 73.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB 49,673 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 27.7 MC Mixed 22 68% 23.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 9.5 SC Mixed 8.1 23% 7.93 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-PLUS Builds (Compare 631 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 47%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-PLUS

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	150x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	132x
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	97x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	122x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	87x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	55x

SSD
Ultimate SU800 256GBAdata $68Bench 91%, 40,725 samples	33x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	25x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	21x

RAM
Value DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 68%, 7,794 samples	80x
ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GBCorsairBench 68%, 7,803 samples	32x
ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 1x16GBCorsairBench 39%, 1,735 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $351

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16