Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics86.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180312
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateApr 25 '20 at 04:40
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 210
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 511
53% 428 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
PNY(196E 11A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 118
Parallax 101
89% 109 fps
MRender 99.6
Gravity 100
Splatting 100
82% 100 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC-WR 500GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 113 44 32 36 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 336
Write 312
Mixed 218
SusWrite 66.4
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 33.2
111% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 22.3
73% 160 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 104%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
761GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 84 85 85 85 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 63.6
Write 65.5
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 85.2
46% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
74GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 61 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 60.8
Write 59.1
Mixed 51.4
SusWrite 60.8
43% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
886GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 116 115 118 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 65.3
Write 109
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 116
66% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 140 139 141 139 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 161
Write 156
Mixed 102
SusWrite 139
103% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
58.7% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 18.9
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 18.7
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,050 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $488
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback