Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 04 '20 at 21:07
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 121
2-Core 244
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 616
64% 511 Pts
64-Core 618
38% 618 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC-WR 500GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 225 233 225 235 180 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 355
Write 322
Mixed 220
SusWrite 214
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 48.3
4K Mixed 32.5
109% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 29.5
77% 164 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 104%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
873GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 68 69 72 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 69.2
Write 68.4
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 69.8
45% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
74GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 60 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 60.2
Write 60.6
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 60.8
43% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 116 116 117 120 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 88.2
Write 104
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 120
70% 95 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
59% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 99 100 100 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 159
Write 164
Mixed 105
SusWrite 99.3
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 101%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW-SD/MS 32GB
30GB free, PID 0301
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 7 6.9 6.8 7 7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
9.81% Terrible
Read 41
Write 11
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 7.1
22% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1.3
74% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.81%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 20.1
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 22.1
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 65%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,051 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $488
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback