Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 04 '20 at 00:38
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 93.5
1-Core 121
2-Core 244
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 615
66% 522 Pts
64-Core 617
38% 617 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
PNY(196E 11A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 117
Parallax 102
89% 109 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 101
Splatting 103
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC-WR 500GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 214 160 246 143 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 344
Write 324
Mixed 256
SusWrite 174
62% 274 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 28.6
106% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 30.6
78% 165 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 104%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$69
869GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 68 69 71 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 67.3
Write 68.8
Mixed 39
SusWrite 69.3
45% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
70GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 61 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 59.8
Write 60.5
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 60.9
44% 58.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 117 118 115 117 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 93.3
Write 103
Mixed 70
SusWrite 120
71% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 100 100 100 100 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 160
Write 164
Mixed 106
SusWrite 99.4
98% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
190% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 101%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW-SD/MS 32GB
29GB free, PID 0301
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 41
Write 25.5
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 7.4
24% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.3
77% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.6% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 19.8
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 21.3
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 61.1
66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,039 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $159

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $465
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback