| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 72.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 15.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20181207 |
| Uptime | 7.2 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 29 '22 at 09:07 |
| Run Duration | 187 Seconds |
| Run User | PHL-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.7%
Good
|
59% 102 Pts
|
45% 367 Pts
|
29% 467 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$240
Zotac(19DA 3527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
72.8%
Very good
|
75% 89.2 fps
|
69% 85.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata SX6000LNP 128GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9001c01
|
141% 642 MB/s
|
110% 42.1 MB/s
|
150% 186 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$40
79GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 133 165 160 152 162 MB/s
|
89.3%
Excellent
|
103% 141 MB/s
|
154% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$65
36GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 93 94 91 93 MB/s
|
40.4%
Average
|
50% 67.2 MB/s
|
62% 0.53 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G KHX2400C15/16G 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
|
60.2%
Good
|
63% 22.1 GB/s
|
45% 15.6 GB/s
|
38% 105 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
SkillBench Score 44: 8R 1G 1B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44% | 19% | 53 | 274 | 195 | 100 | 27" | 1920 1080 | SAC2700 HDMI |
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 9,849 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $100
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $165Bench 73%, 446,215 samples | 1,215x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $95Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 1,063x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 878x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $146Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 823x |
| RX 570AMD $170Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 633x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 554x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $468 |