Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	86.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180312
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '20 at 12:24
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Memory 93.3 1-Core 123 2-Core 246 87% 154 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 615 62% 501 Pts	64-Core 617 38% 617 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% PNY(196E 11A0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Lighting 109 Reflection 118 Parallax 112 89% 113 fps	MRender 100 Gravity 100 Splatting 103 83% 101 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC-WR 500GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 147GB free (System drive) Firmware: X411 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 197 57 62 78 64 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	64% Good	Read 354 Write 298 Mixed 158 SusWrite 104 51% 229 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 48.3 4K Mixed 33.2 105% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 262 DQ Write 203 DQ Mixed 20.1 73% 162 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 104%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 873GB free Firmware: ST6OA31B SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 68 68 71 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 66.7 Write 71.4 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 69.1 45% 61.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 61%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 74GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 60 61 61 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 63.6 Write 58.5 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 60.7 43% 58.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 117 117 117 120 127 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	55.3% Above average	Read 72.2 Write 107 Mixed 67.6 SusWrite 120 68% 91.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 90%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 168 165 169 168 169 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	96% Outstanding	Read 166 Write 119 Mixed 99 SusWrite 168 102% 138 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 101%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW-SD/MS 32GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 30GB free, PID 0301 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 7.3 7.2 7.3 7.3 7.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 41 Write 9.5 Mixed 9.3 SusWrite 7.7 17% 16.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.2 74% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 38%
USB DISK 3.0 16GB 1,966 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 10GB free, PID 5500 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	24.2% Poor	Read 122 Write 17.7 Mixed 12.7 SusWrite 17.5 40% 42.6 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 42% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB 48,796 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	65% Good	MC Read 24.5 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 20 64% 22.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 21.4 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 61.4 65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,050 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $158

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $50Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	1,540x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	958x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	567x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	312x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	275x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	238x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	176x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	142x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	107x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	91x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	87x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	81x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $488

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48