Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180312
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 13 '20 at 19:29
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 218
83% 144 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 615
64% 515 Pts
64-Core 620
38% 620 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC-WR 500GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 187 136 131 215 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 350
Write 127
Mixed 148
SusWrite 137
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 22.9
95% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 19
65% 145 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 104%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
761GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 85 87 85 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 63.3
Write 64.6
Mixed 37.4
SusWrite 85.6
46% 62.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
74GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 61 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 64.8
Write 59.7
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 60.7
44% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
860GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 124 122 114 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 144
Write 148
Mixed 66
SusWrite 119
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 159 157 158 158 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 106
Mixed 104
SusWrite 158
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
60.8% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 19.5
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 19.9
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,050 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $488
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback