Biostar H410MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics38.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar H410MH  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200603
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateApr 29 '24 at 02:21
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$125
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 84.2
1-Core 119
2-Core 235
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 729
71% 582 Pts
64-Core 890
55% 890 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
ASRock(1849 5026) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.8% Below average
Lighting 45.9
Reflection 57.7
Parallax 71.5
37% 58.4 fps
MRender 57.6
Gravity 56.4
Splatting 42.3
42% 52.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ256HAJD-000L1 256GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BL1QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 75 75 84 85 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 948
Write 125
Mixed 160
SusWrite 80.6
70% 328 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 32.7
129% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 97.8
DQ Mixed 147
116% 165 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 177%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
131GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 87 83 87 80 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 78.8
Write 76.7
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 83.9
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 7EH55AA# 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.4% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 21.2
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 20.2
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 17 60 20" 1280 720 SAM078C SA300/SA350
Typical H410MH Builds (Compare 996 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar H410MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $250
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback